Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2016-09-24 - Amphion's New 3LS Loudspeaker
- 2016-11-01 - Hegel H360 vs. Devialet 120 or 200?
- 2016-08-19 - Wharfedale Diamond 225 vs. SVS Prime Bookshelf
- 2016-09-10 - KEF Reference 201/2 -- Still Recommended?
- 2016-10-27 - Vivid Giya G3 vs. Vivid B1 Decade vs. KEF Blade Two
- 2016-08-26 - Is MQA Going to Go the Way of HDCD?
- 2017-01-15 - Luxman L-550AX -- the Little Amp that Probably Can
- 2016-10-26 - B&O BeoLab 90 Video and Review
- 2017-05-01 - A Paradigm Active/40 Owner on Active Speakers
- 2017-01-24 - Sonus Faber Olympica III vs. PSB Imagine T3
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 18 December 2010 18 December 2010
To Vade Forrester,
I, too, saw these [Cerwin-Vega CLS-215] and thought some cones would be necessary for optimal sound. I also contacted someone from C-V and suggested an SE version with oak or walnut finish! How did you use the cones? Did you glue them on? I guess I just can't visualize how you would get them under the speakers unless you attached them somehow? Also, would custom Sound Anchors be a good idea?
Lot of speaker for the dough. Did you really like them? Please advise, and thanks Vade.
Thanks for checking out our reviews. The cones I used were so massive (each one weighed five pounds) that I could just rest the speaker on top of them and the weight held them in place. It was a two-person operation to get them under the speakers. Had they been my speakers, I would definitely have screwed the cones into the wood, but neither the speakers nor the cones were mine. Weirdly enough, the cones, made from a super-hard stainless-steel alloy on a CNC lathe, cost as much as the speakers!
I like your idea of an SE version with real-wood veneer. That would make the CLS-215s more acceptable in one’s living room. It wouldn’t hurt if the speaker's walls were thicker too; I think they used 0.5" wood. Not sure what you mean by a custom Sound Anchor. I would be reluctant to raise the speakers higher, due to the height of the tweeter axis, unless they were tilted forward a bit.
Yes, I really liked the CLS-215s, but keep that in perspective; my reference $6k speakers sounded quite a bit better, as they doggone well should. As you said, they were a lot of speaker for the dough. I would probably have looked at the model with a single 15" woofer if I were interested in buying; the tweeter axis on the two-woofer model was just too high. The single-woofer model went almost as deep and was almost as efficient. . . . Vade Forrester