Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2016-09-24 - Amphion's New 3LS Loudspeaker
- 2016-11-01 - Hegel H360 vs. Devialet 120 or 200?
- 2016-09-10 - KEF Reference 201/2 -- Still Recommended?
- 2016-10-27 - Vivid Giya G3 vs. Vivid B1 Decade vs. KEF Blade Two
- 2016-08-26 - Is MQA Going to Go the Way of HDCD?
- 2017-01-15 - Luxman L-550AX -- the Little Amp that Probably Can
- 2016-10-26 - B&O BeoLab 90 Video and Review
- 2017-05-01 - A Paradigm Active/40 Owner on Active Speakers
- 2017-01-24 - Sonus Faber Olympica III vs. PSB Imagine T3
- 2016-11-02 - Bryston Mini A and Mini T
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 12 January 2015 12 January 2015
To Doug Schneider,
I read with interest your review of the KEF Reference 1 loudspeaker. It sounds like a great “little” speaker, but as you point out, it naturally lacks the lower octave.
With that marvelous review it would be really interesting to learn how the floorstanding Ref 3 and 5 models would be rated since I expect them to have the “full” frequency range missing in the Ref 1 model.
I hope I will get an opportunity to hear one of the KEF Reference floorstanders later this year. I have heard a short session with the KEF R900 and R700 and I also found them to lack in coherence.
Coherency definitely wasn’t a problem with the Reference 1 in my room -- utterly seamless across the audioband. That said, I too would love to hear the Reference 3 or 5 to learn what some fleshing out in the bass can do. That, though, isn’t likely to happen, at least for me -- if I review another KEF loudspeaker in the near future, it’ll be the Blade Two, which I have requested. But if you do manage to hear the 3 or 5, drop me a line and tell me your thoughts. . . . Doug Schneider