Most-Read Feedback Articles (Last 365 Days)
- 2018-01-04 - Legacy Signature SE Up Against the Magico A3
- 2017-07-30 - PrimaLuna, Devialet, Hegel Music Systems, NAD -- Integrated Amp Shootout
- 2018-01-01 - Naim and Magico
- 2017-08-28 - Revel Performa3 F206 vs. KEF R500
- 2017-08-10 - To Change for the Better
- 2017-09-01 - Buying the Best -- "Hard Knocks" Learning
- 2017-10-02 - "The MQA Balloon"
- 2017-10-01 - What If MQA Succeeds?
- 2017-10-07 - Some Impressive MQA Testing
- 2017-12-21 - The Validity of Doug's Sonus Faber Olympica III Review
- Category: Reader Feedback Reader Feedback
- Created: 28 November 2012 28 November 2012
To Hans Wetzel,
There aren’t many reviews of the Arcam D33 about and I discovered yours. I don’t care whether anyone else appreciates the D33 -- I love it. And I see you came to a similar conclusion.
In April 2012 I walked into the Arcam room at the Bristol Hi-Fi Show to ask the Arcam guys a question. I heard some realistic music playing and asked them what it was coming from. “It’s our new DAC," they replied. We had a conversation about digital conversion, and I left well impressed, but with no interest to buy such a piece of gear.
A few weeks later I bought an Arcam rDAC in a sale to give computer-based digital audio a try. This proved to be enjoyable (clean, clear, and agreeably musical). My PC and old CD players freshened up.
At the UK Head-Fi September meet in Cambridge, Arcam were next to me and for two hours I had a D33 plugged into my headphone amp. This proved to be so enjoyable that I knew I wanted one. I had no interest anymore in listening to gear that masked the music. I was lucky to find a way to own one within a couple of weeks. I have not regretted this purchase for a picosecond.
I love it; or should I say, I love all my music again. I was amazed at myself buying such an expensive DAC but in real terms it is less expensive than some other equipment I have bought over the years. This thing relays music. That’s it. I would say it is the single best piece of equipment I have ever invested in. Because it is a terrific musical source, everything else stands on it.
I am getting constant delights from listening to music through it. And I don’t feel I paid too much. I think it a shame that this humble-looking gear will be overlooked by the sensation seekers. Incidentally, I said to an Arcam engineer that it was lacking a display and such, he just said "What does it need one for?"
Happy listening and best regards,
Geoff, I am glad that you are deriving such pleasure from Arcam's FMJ D33. It is unlike other DACs I have heard, and organic in a way that makes "traditional" digital sound difficult to return to. In one other review that I have read of the unit, the reviewer seemed a bit unconvinced by its "laid back" presentation, one that wasn't overtly sharp and finely delineated. In time, I think reviewers will come around to this newer breed of DAC that are as resolving as reference-level DACs of years past, but do without the "digital edge" that many, myself included, have come to expect.
I am in the midst of reviewing Benchmark Media Systems' DAC2 HGR, a digital-to-analog converter and preamp, for GoodSound!, a sister site. I am happy to report that the Benchmark is cut from the same sonic cloth as the Arcam, but for $1300 USD less. Now seems to be as good a time as any to hop on the computer audio train, as you have done. Enjoy the Arcam! . . . Hans Wetzel